

Medium format such as prism and waistlevel finders and interchangeable backs.Įrgonomic level is very high, the buttons and controls generally being "just In that regard, yet offering much better image quality and convenient aspects of It boasts many advanced features, again being similar to a 35mm camera With their all-metal construction, are considerably heavier than some otherīrands. It's fairly compact for a medium format SLR, although its Zeiss lenses, User-friendly, like most 645 format- but unlike many larger medium formatĬameras. The Contax 645 is somewhat like a slightly overgrown 35mm model. I do still like and recommend the Contax highly. Movement capability, and now do most of my work in 4x5 and 6x8 formats, although InĮarly 2003, I eventually sold the entire Contax system due to its lack of Lenses, in particular due to the reputation of its 120mm macro lens. Shorter, I finally chose the Contax due to its features as well as its Zeiss It due to its sensitivity to shutter vibration. I gave a lot of thought to Pentax 67, but in the end decided against I considered many brands and models: Pentax and Mamiya in particular, as well asĬontax 645. Which would replace 35mm as an all-purpose camera. Using the Mamiya for six months, I began the search for a medium format SLR Were so far superior to 35mm that I knew that medium format was for me.

It does, however, make very nice 6x7 images, and the results that it gave me Imprecise framing, difficulty using certain filters, and no closeup capability. Nice camera but limited in what it can do, being a rangefinder…no long lenses, My first medium format camera was a Mamiya 7 II, purchased in July 1999. Please note that I no longer own nor use this camera system and cannot answer questions as to current status of lenses, parts, etc.
